beachdeath:

beachdeath:

i stand in solidarity with the houston journalist who tweeted, on her work account, to 125,000 followers, “O’Rourke is like the guy who is all sweet and nerdy but holds you down and makes you cum until your calves cramp”

me after getting dragged for using my work twitter account to post about how i want beto o’rourke to hold me down and make me cum until my calves cramp: this is exactly like hillary clinton losing the presidential election

kaylapocalypse:

odinsnotwearingmakeup:

windycat:

ginevre:

theaustinstollhaus:

i-am-corbin-dallas:

theaustinstollhaus:

theaustinstollhaus:

When people go off about how English is the worst language, I just wanna point out a few things:

– Our future tense requires only one word (looking at you, Spanish)

– Words don’t change meanings depending on tone (Cantonese)

– We don’t live in some bizarre Beauty And The Beast world where we give inanimate objects genders (romance languages, German)

– Likewise, we don’t have have two different words for “they” because we don’t care whether “they” were male or female (Spanish, French)

– There’s no formal “you” because we don’t play mind games about whether or not we respect you (Spanish, German)

– We don’t alter the whole fucking language based on how much we respect you (Japanese)

– The letters and sounds might not be consistent, but at least we have letters, not just pictures (Mandarin)

– We don’t have a fucking stupid tense specifically for talking to two people because some idiot decided that a two-person tense was necessary (Arabic)

So yeah, I think we’re doing okay as a language

Oh and some of our plurals are irregular, but at least it’s not like every goddamn plural is an entirely new word so you have to learn every word twice

At least it’s not like that, right? Right, Arabic? WHAT A DUMB IDEA THAT WOULD BE, HUH, ARABIC?

But we do kinda have the tone thing. Like record and record, resume and resume, etc

For a few words, but you can mispronounce a lot and still get away with it. I’m referring to this:

I love this post

Verbs don’t conjugate depending on who is doing the action and in what manner. (Finnish)

This is Greek and Russian erasure and I want to die each and every day

Reblogging literally just for that horrifying Shi story

fidefortitude:

slumbermancer:

basically, i think the general rule of thumb is: if someone REALLY wants the blood that’s inside of your body, and they’re like… a vampire, or a dracula, or some sort of mansquito, then that’s probably okay. a dracula and a mansquito are made for removing things like blood and swords from inside your body.

that’s basically fine.

if something wants to get at your blood, and they’re, say, some kind of murdersaurus, or maybe a really big frog, that’s where the problems start to arise. a really frog is not made for removing blood, and your blood knows this, which is why it is so vehement about wanting to stay IN your body instead of coming out. 

unfortunately this will not deter a really big frog, because a really big frog is full of things like prizes, and value, and quite a lot of hatred, and it would REALLY rather like to replace any and all of those things with your blood, and basically by any means possible.

These words scan with a fantastic degree of confidence considering that together they make no sense at all